Jerome Miron-USA TODAY Sports

Should the Texas Rangers Trade Adrian Beltre and Elvis Andrus?

Yesterday Jon Paul Morosi argued that the Texas Rangers should trade Adrian Beltre and Elvis Andrus in order to acquire some young pitching. Most Rangers fans likely responded the same way, with a very vocal, “No”. Beltre and Andrus are two of the most popular Texas Rangers. This is for good reason as the two are both talented and contagiously happy.

They are a pleasure to watch and are certainly top players at their positions. So why trade Beltre or Andrus?

The answer is simple, the Rangers have the farm system depth to potentially replace them and both may be more valuable as trade pieces than as Texas Rangers going forward. The way the season is going Jon Daniels may have to consider trading some pieces away at the deadline in order to restock for 2015 and beyond. The Rangers are not out of it yet and if the team can tread water until players like Derek Holland, Geovany Soto and Jurickson Profar(or not) return then the team may avoid a fire sale all together. However, if the team struggles and falls further out of the race before the trade deadline then Jon Daniels will look to trade some players.

Some players will be obvious trade candidates. Players like Alex Rios, Neal Cotts, Colby Lewis and Joakim Soria are in their walk year with Texas. Veterans like these will be the first to go. After these obvious trade options Daniels will have to decide if he wants to trade a player like Beltre or Andrus.

Morosi argues that the Rangers need to deal Beltre and Andrus in order to acquire young pitching. If the Rangers are willing to take on some of the money left on the contracts of these two then it may well be that Texas could get good young players in exchange. Any contending team that could add Adrian Beltre to the middle of their lineup or improve their defense up the middle with Andrus would improve dramatically. It is tough to add star caliber players at the deadline so Texas would theoretically get a good trade haul for either player.

Trading these players would set Texas back a few years in terms of contending. Replacing Andrus and Beltre with Profar and Joey Gallo might be great in the long run but likely be bad for contention in 2015. The question is if this team needs to be rebuilt. Trading Beltre and Andrus would signal that the Rangers officially need a rebuild.

Texas has a great system already in place with many good pieces likely to join Texas in a year or two. One thing Morosi argues is that the Rangers need starting pitching. While it appears that way this year, because of an impossible number of injuries, both the major league depth and the farm system depth will show through moving forward. Martin Perez and Derek Holland will both come back. Nick Martinez and Nick Tepesch are making big strides in the rotation this year. The farm system has several arms on track to make the big leagues over the next two years. Players like Luke Jackson, Alex Gonzalez, and Alec Asher look

Kevin Jairaj-USA TODAY Sports

good this year and could possibly be ready to make big league appearances in 2015 or 2016. While superficially the pitching staff looks bad now, the reality is that this could be a top notch pitching staff in 2015 and 2016. This means that while trading Andrus and/or Beltre would cause the team to not contend in the short run, it may not be that long before the Rangers rise back to the top of the AL.

The reality is that Beltre is 35 and only signed for one year after 2015. Trading Beltre could be a wise, if painful, decision. Several teams would potentially have interest in acquiring a third baseman. Contending teams like the New York Yankees, Boston Red Sox, Los Angeles Angels, Los Angeles Dodgers, Kansas City Royals, and St. Louis Cardinals might have a need that Beltre could fill. Trading Beltre with a year and a half left on his contract should return one of a team’s top prospects. The Yankees probably do not have the prospects to land Beltre if other teams really want him. It seems the Rangers will not want to trade Beltre within division but Daniels has shown that he will trade with rivals. Of the remaining potential suitors mentioned here, the Cardinals and Royals make the most sense if they remain in contention at the trade deadline. The Jays, Red Sox and Dodgers would certainly find that Beltre is a huge upgrade over their current players but they all have serviceable players at this point. The Royals and Cardinals would make excellent trade partners for the Rangers because of their farm depth and pitching prospects.

Trading Andrus would be more difficult because Andrus’s contract is too large to easily trade. If the Rangers traded Andrus they would need to take on a large part of his contract in order to get much back for Andrus. The Rangers can afford this based on their incoming TV revenues. The teams interested in short stops is shorter than those potentially needing third basemen. Now that Boston has signed Stephen Drew there are few teams that appear to need a short stop. The New York Mets, Seattle Mariners, Cincinnati Reds and St. Louis Cardinals are possible trade destinations but hardly seem realistic landing spots.

Rick Osentoski-USA TODAY Sports

Rick Osentoski-USA TODAY Sports

The Mets are not contenders this year but they could use Andrus since he is under long term contract. The Reds and Cardinals are potential contenders who do not have great shortstops and could use an upgrade at short. The problem is Andrus may not represent a significant enough upgrade for them to part with a decent prospect.

The most obvious team is the Detroit Tigers. The Tigers have the farm system to trade for Andrus which make for an interest middle infield as Andrus would be reunited with Ian Kinsler.

In the end, Texas could land a couple young pitchers and some additional pieces in exchange for Andrus and Beltre. The type of players these two could be traded for would give the Rangers another chance at the Rangers golden era that has been slipping over the last several years. Texas is caught between adding players to try to fill holes and trading off players to rebuild. If Texas decides to rebuild it might be worth it to trade Beltre and/or Andrus.

Next Rangers Game View full schedule »
Wednesday, Sep 33 Sep7:10at Kansas City RoyalsBuy Tickets

Tags: Texas Rangers

  • RangersApologist

    Why do people keep thinking Gallo could be called up this year or next? He is not ready. Give the guy time to develop and at least see what happens to him at AA first.

    • Lee Stitzel

      Gallo could be a 2016 call up. He’s tearing it up at an incredible pace this year. It is probably best that he gets more time in the minors because he needs to develop a better hit tool and feel for the zone but if we have learned anything about prospects the last few years is that top prospects can produce at surprisingly early points in their career.

  • Brice Paterik

    I think Soria will be the first to go. Good closers always are wanted at the deadline and usually bring a good return. Rios they might hold on to and make a qualifying offer in the off season to bring back a compensation first round pick. Free agent market will be weak for hitters this off season and Rios will be at the top of the list.

    • Lee Stitzel

      Perhaps Michael Choice will make Rios expandable but he hasn’t so far. Choice has scuffled lately.

  • cliffstep

    Let’s be sure I understand. We’re losing games 2-0 , 3-1 , and you STILL want to talk about getting pitchers?

    • Lee Stitzel

      Great point. The aggregate stats favor the pitching. Pitching has been this team’s strong point. Morosi’s argument though this that the farm isn’t as deep in pitching as it is in hitting.

    • RangersApologist

      You can NEVER have enough good pitching. NEVER.

      • cliffstep

        Well , sure , in an absolute sense. But , trade Adrian or Elvis this year for pitching? I’d say no.
        It takes three things to win a game: pitching , defense , and you need at least one run more than your opponent. If the price for getting a pitcher , who plays one day a week is one run per game scored and a couple runs a week given up on defense , is that still worth it? Cliff Lee didn’t get us a ring. Has any one-year-deal pitcher acquired during the season ever gotten any team a ring? Don’t get me wrong. Pitching is first , just not only.

        • RangersApologist

          I fully understand you have to score runs, but if you are trading Beltre or Andrus, you will get more than just a pitcher, you will get a gold mine in return. And in that haul you expect to get position players and pitchers. But this team is VERY thin on pitching right now, extremely thin. Harry is done, I don’t think he will ever pitch again. Holland is well, Holland. Perez, won’t be effective until 2016. Is Tepesch the real deal? Who knows. Martinez? Not bad. The only pitcher Texas can count on is Darvish…and once again he has a stiff neck. You build your team pitching first, defense next then offense. The Rangers can much more easily acquire offensive production, but pitching is a premium that is difficult to develop or purchase when the market is thin.

          • cliffstep

            I hear ya – and it’s not that I disagree so much as I’m kinda tired of getting burned by pitchers. The words , Chan Ho Park still makes my blood boil. I have just hoped , for awhile now , that we were going to really build the farm system and stick to it.
            On the other hand , I can remember trading some unknown outfielder named Sosa to Chicago for that great hitter….hooray! I can’t remember his name right now! But , he hit , what , .200 before walking away.
            It’s always a balancing act , but , ya know , no one ever says the hardest thing in sports is pitching a baseball , do they?

          • RangersApologist

            Harold Baines and lets not forget they also gave Wilson Alvarez away in that deal.

            No the hardest is hitting a baseball, but there are more hitters out there than good pitchers.