5 potential pathways the Rangers could follow as trade deadline uncertainty swirls

Entering this current four-game set against the rival Seattle Mariners, Texas Rangers president of baseball operations Chris Young was still waiting for a sign as to which direction to take the club with the 2026 trade deadline looming. Things were looking like the pendulum was firmly going to swing in the direction of buying after the first two games, but yesterday's meltdown let the seeds of doubt creep back in while also highlighting the Rangers' most dire need.

The reality is that we might not get a real resolution until the end of this week. Texas has one more crucial game against the Mariners to finish this set, and then has to take on the AL-leading Tampa Bay Rays before finishing the week against another key foe, the Houston Astros, to close out the week.

While the Athletics have receded into the background, Seattle and Houston are just 1.5 and 2.0 games back of the Rangers, respectively. Things could change in the blink of an eye, and the crowded wild-card picture is something no team truly wants to wade through.

So with that said, we're going to take a look at the five different ways that Texas can handle the trade deadline, while trying to figure out which pathway truly makes the most sense.

All five trade deadline strategies the Rangers have at their disposal

1. Aggressively buy

This would mean throwing caution to the wind and pushing the chips to the center of the table. It's something that Young has done in the past with mixed results. It's also a big reason why the Rangers came in with such a lowly farm system (well, that and the MacKenzie Gore trade), which has since been downgraded to No. 27 in the league by Baseball America.

While some have suggested that Young could be uber aggressive this go around, the fact of the matter is that he doesn't really have the pieces to make that happen. The one caveat is that he could potentially do this if he were to move both Sebastian Walcott and Caden Scarborough, but that would likely be a mistake. Having some foresight and considering the future as well as the present is much more prudent.

Verdict - not a valid strategy

2. Opportunistically buying

Here we could still see the Rangers load up for the stretch run, but with some restraint. This strategy would require prioritizing which needs must be addressed and separating those from things that appear to be needs but are really luxuries.

What this might look like is going out and getting a couple of bullpen arms that can play in both middle relief and high leverage, but skimping on adding to the starting rotation and/or finding a right-handed outfield bat, unless Young finds some real value at either of these positions. This might be the most prudent approach he could take, but it could result in a playoff berth that coincides with an early exit.

Verdict - valid strategy

3. Stand pat

Young could decide not to raise the ante while declining to fold his hand at the same time and basically rock with what he's got, seeing where the chips may fall in the process. This might sound like waving the white flag, but it's not. At least, not completely.

For as many gripes as we might have about the state of the roster, this is largely the group that has the team in first place in the division roughly two-thirds of the way through the season. And that's something they've done largely without Corey Seager, who, when he's been on the field, hasn't been productive.

This path forward hinges greatly on Seager coming back and hitting like the superstar he's been in the past, as well as a couple of the rookie relievers in the pen finding their footing. The benefit here is that Texas can preserve its top prospect assets while still trying to contend.

Verdict - valid strategy

4. Mix buying and selling

This is the re-tooling rather than rebuilding path. In this scenario, typically a club trades away veteran rentals while buying more controllable assets. It could also involve trading from a strength on the big league roster to fill in weaknesses.

This isn't an easy balancing act for the Rangers to pursue, in part because they don't have many expiring contracts beyond Joc Pederson. Too many bloated contracts with multiple years remaining stand in the way of Young trying to go down this path.

Verdict - not a valid strategy

5. Sell

You could argue that there are different ways that a team can sell, ranging from a full-blown fire sale to a more restrained way to move on from veteran assets. Selling from where Texas currently sits in the standings is a ridiculous proposition, but a bad week might put this in play.

The problem Chris Young would face if he wants to sell is that what he has to offer might not have a robust market. Seager, Jacob deGrom, and Nathan Eovaldi would be the prime candidates, but they all make serious money with multiple years remaining on their contracts. Those are tough sells, unless the Rangers eat significant money.

Verdict - not a valid strategy

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Follow