1 big lesson the Rangers should learn from the Guardians and their postseason run

For a good chunk of the 2026 season, the Cleveland Guardians and the Texas Rangers were following a similar trajectory. The Rangers and Guardians were battling each other for Wild Card positioning for a large portion of the stretch run. Ultimately, Cleveland pulled away and passed the Chicago White Sox for first place in the AL Central, while Texas ran out of gas.

There are more similarities between the two teams. Both clubs experienced challenges scoring runs, with the Guardians plating a 24th-ranked 678 runs and the Rangers coming in 25th with 673. And both the Rangers and the Guardians saw their star players suffer injury-influenced disappointing seasons. Jose Ramirez broke his hamate bone in June and was limited to just 125 games, hitting just .235/.320/.368 with 12 homers. Corey Seager's three IL stints were well documented, and he hit just .227/.312/.424 with 20 dingers.

However, there was one big difference between how these two organizations come down to their philosophy on handling in-season transactions, and it made all the difference in their fortunes as the Guardians are up 2-1 in the ALCS, and the Rangers are sitting at home in Arlington.

The Guardians aggressively attacked needs during the season, while the Rangers were timid

The difference between Texas and Cleveland is simple. Cleveland was proactive about solving needs during the season, while the Rangers hedged and seemed to have no clear vision.

For example, the Guardians found early on that their catching situation was an issue, so they went out in May and traded for Patrick Bailey. Bailey is a defensive whiz behind the plate with two Gold Gloves on his resume. Cleveland also liked what it saw in his offensive profile and coached him up to the point where he's now been a postseason hero.

At the trade deadline, the Guardians continued being aggressive. They needed more right-handed pop in their lineup and landed Jo Adell from the Angels. The 27-year-old outfielder put up a 107 wRC+ down the stretch and is under team control for 2027 as well.

They also wanted to lengthen their lineup and went out and got former Rangers first baseman Nathaniel Lowe. Lowe had a superb first half with the Cincinnati Reds and has gone on to get several clutch hits for Cleveland so far during the playoff run.

Compare that to what the Rangers did at the trade deadline, and the distinction is very clear. Chris Young publicly waffled on buying or selling in the lead-up to the deadline and then did neither, though not for lack of trying.

Young had his thoughts of possibly kicking off a rebuild derailed when Jacob deGrom made it known that he'd block a trade to the Atlanta Braves or anyone else. That left Young to add Logan O'Hoppe, who he immediately optioned to Round Rock, and relievers Chase Silseth and Adam Macko, the latter of whom was already in the minors at the time of the deal.

Of the three, only Silseth really had any hope of making an impact, and as a singular reliever, the chances of him swinging the pendulum on his own were very slim.

The takeaway here is twofold. First, while the Guardians didn't swing any blockbusters, they got quality players who were capable of moving the needle. The Rangers didn't do that. Second, Cleveland didn't wait until the deadline to address areas of need. Texas did, and had the team acted with more urgency, it might have picked up a couple of extra wins earlier in the season that would have made the difference in the playoff chase.

Ultimately, this is about having a vision and working with a sense of urgency to realize that vision. Young said last winter that despite the Rangers' reduction in payroll, they expected to compete. His actions said otherwise.

Add us as a preferred source on Google

Follow